Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 23, 2022 at 16:59 history left closed in review Buzz
Jon Custer
Mithridates the Great
Original close reason(s) were not resolved
S May 19, 2022 at 17:58 review Reopen votes
May 23, 2022 at 16:59
S May 19, 2022 at 17:58 history edited user43012 CC BY-SA 4.0
Clarified why anonymity would be advantageous in scientific publishing Added to review
May 16, 2022 at 17:24 history closed Louic
Jon Custer
Sursula
Nobody
Mithridates the Great
Needs details or clarity
May 14, 2022 at 15:16 comment added Jon Custer Nothing stops one from using a pseudonym. But use it consistently.
May 14, 2022 at 13:54 comment added Captain Emacs One more reason that Buffy did not cover: why would anyone spend time on doing intense and difficult research, only to disappear behind a screen and with nothing to show for their efforts, not even a boost for their ego if not their career? With anonymous publication, you will mostly get shallow and fast responses, with perhaps some interspersed gems of quick clever insights, or standard textbook wisdom a la Papyrus Rhind. I would even venture so far as to claim (without proof) that maybe the rise of systematic research may be linked to the emergence of rules on authorship and plagiarism.
May 14, 2022 at 13:51 history edited Buffy
edited tags
May 14, 2022 at 13:32 answer added Buffy timeline score: 1
May 14, 2022 at 13:01 review Close votes
May 16, 2022 at 17:24
May 14, 2022 at 12:08 review Low quality posts
May 15, 2022 at 20:55
May 14, 2022 at 11:53 comment added Buffy What would be the point of anonymity? Why make scientific publishing more like Facebook? Conspiracy anyone?
S May 14, 2022 at 11:44 review First questions
May 14, 2022 at 19:13
S May 14, 2022 at 11:44 history asked user43012 CC BY-SA 4.0