Skip to main content
added 143 characters in body
Source Link
Cape Code
  • 27.3k
  • 8
  • 98
  • 151

One approach is to filter by journal.

  • The so-called 'American Journal of Engineering Research' (article 1)
  • The 'Academy & Industry Research Collaboration Center' (AIRCC, publisher of the 'International journal of wireless & mobile networks', article 2)
  • The 'Association of Computer Electronics and Electrical Engineers' (ACEEE, publisher of the 'International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology', article 3)

The so-called 'American Journal of Engineering Research', the 'Academy & Industry Research Collaboration Center (AIRCC, publisher of the "International journal of wireless & mobile networks"), the "Association of Computer Electronics and Electrical Engineers (ACEEE, publisher of the "International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology") are all predatory publishersfake journals and 'predatory publishers' as listed by Jeffrey Beall's list.

This means that no scrutiny was applied in the publishing process, in fact there was no editorial process whatsoever, and thus instances of plagiarism are to be expected. I would recommend not to cite anything found in these pseudo-journals.

The other cueclue is the publication date obviously. The IEEE mark does not constitute an insurance of quality in itself, as pointed out by Anonymous Math. but I would say that it is your best shot in this case.

One approach is to filter by journal.

The so-called 'American Journal of Engineering Research', the 'Academy & Industry Research Collaboration Center (AIRCC, publisher of the "International journal of wireless & mobile networks"), the "Association of Computer Electronics and Electrical Engineers (ACEEE, publisher of the "International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology") are all predatory publishers as listed by Jeffrey Beall's list.

This means that no scrutiny was applied in the publishing process, and instances of plagiarism are to be expected. I would recommend not to cite anything found in these pseudo-journals.

The other cue is the publication date obviously. The IEEE mark does not constitute an insurance of quality in itself, as pointed out by Anonymous Math. but I would say that it is your best shot in this case.

One approach is to filter by journal.

  • The so-called 'American Journal of Engineering Research' (article 1)
  • The 'Academy & Industry Research Collaboration Center' (AIRCC, publisher of the 'International journal of wireless & mobile networks', article 2)
  • The 'Association of Computer Electronics and Electrical Engineers' (ACEEE, publisher of the 'International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology', article 3)

are all fake journals and 'predatory publishers' as listed by Jeffrey Beall's list.

This means that no scrutiny was applied in the publishing process, in fact there was no editorial process whatsoever, and thus instances of plagiarism are to be expected. I would recommend not to cite anything found in these pseudo-journals.

The other clue is the publication date obviously. The IEEE mark does not constitute an insurance of quality in itself, as pointed out by Anonymous Math. but I would say that it is your best shot in this case.

added 49 characters in body
Source Link
Cape Code
  • 27.3k
  • 8
  • 98
  • 151

One approach is to filter by journal.

The so-called 'American Journal of Engineering Research', the 'Academy & Industry Research Collaboration Center (AIRCC, publisher of the "International journal of wireless & mobile networks"), the "Association of Computer Electronics and Electrical Engineers (ACEEE, publisher of the "International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology") are all predatory publishers as listed by Jeffrey Beall's list.

This means that no scrutiny was applied in the publishing process, and instances of plagiarism are to be expected. I would recommend not to cite anything found in these pseudo-journals.

The other cue is the publication date obviously. The IEEE mark does not constitute an insurance of quality in itself, as pointed out by Anonymous Math. but I would say that it is your best shot in this case.

One approach is to filter by journal.

The so-called 'American Journal of Engineering Research', the 'Academy & Industry Research Collaboration Center (AIRCC, publisher of the "International journal of wireless & mobile networks"), the "Association of Computer Electronics and Electrical Engineers (ACEEE, publisher of the "International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology") are all predatory publishers as listed by Jeffrey Beall's list.

This means that no scrutiny was applied in the publishing process, and instances of plagiarism are to be expected. I would recommend not to cite anything found in these pseudo-journals.

The IEEE mark does not constitute an insurance of quality in itself, as pointed out by Anonymous Math. but I would say that it is your best shot in this case.

One approach is to filter by journal.

The so-called 'American Journal of Engineering Research', the 'Academy & Industry Research Collaboration Center (AIRCC, publisher of the "International journal of wireless & mobile networks"), the "Association of Computer Electronics and Electrical Engineers (ACEEE, publisher of the "International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology") are all predatory publishers as listed by Jeffrey Beall's list.

This means that no scrutiny was applied in the publishing process, and instances of plagiarism are to be expected. I would recommend not to cite anything found in these pseudo-journals.

The other cue is the publication date obviously. The IEEE mark does not constitute an insurance of quality in itself, as pointed out by Anonymous Math. but I would say that it is your best shot in this case.

added 34 characters in body
Source Link
Cape Code
  • 27.3k
  • 8
  • 98
  • 151

One approach is to filter by journal.

The so-called 'American Journal of Engineering Research', the 'Academy & Industry Research Collaboration Center (AIRCC, publisher of the "International journal of wireless & mobile networks"), the "Association of Computer Electronics and Electrical Engineers (ACEEE, publisher of the "International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology") are all predatory publishers as listed by Jeffrey Beall's list.

This means that no scrutiny was applied in the publishing process, and instances of plagiarism are to be expected. I would recommend not to cite anything found in these pseudo-journals.

The IEEE mark does not constitute an insurance of quality in itself, as pointed out by Anonymous Math. but I would say that it is your best shot in this case.

One approach is to filter by journal.

The so-called 'American Journal of Engineering Research', the 'Academy & Industry Research Collaboration Center (AIRCC, publisher of the "International journal of wireless & mobile networks"), the "Association of Computer Electronics and Electrical Engineers (ACEEE, publisher of the "International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology") are all predatory publishers as listed by Jeffrey Beall's list.

This means that no scrutiny was applied in the publishing process, and instances of plagiarism are to be expected. I would recommend not to cite anything found in these pseudo-journals.

The IEEE mark does not constitute an insurance of quality in itself, but I would say that it is your best shot in this case.

One approach is to filter by journal.

The so-called 'American Journal of Engineering Research', the 'Academy & Industry Research Collaboration Center (AIRCC, publisher of the "International journal of wireless & mobile networks"), the "Association of Computer Electronics and Electrical Engineers (ACEEE, publisher of the "International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology") are all predatory publishers as listed by Jeffrey Beall's list.

This means that no scrutiny was applied in the publishing process, and instances of plagiarism are to be expected. I would recommend not to cite anything found in these pseudo-journals.

The IEEE mark does not constitute an insurance of quality in itself, as pointed out by Anonymous Math. but I would say that it is your best shot in this case.

Source Link
Cape Code
  • 27.3k
  • 8
  • 98
  • 151
Loading