Timeline for How to repond to reviewer comment that findings in existing literature contrast my findings?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Jan 9, 2022 at 9:03 | vote | accept | Jan3 | ||
S Dec 30, 2021 at 17:58 | vote | accept | Jan3 | ||
S Jan 9, 2022 at 9:03 | |||||
S Dec 30, 2021 at 17:58 | vote | accept | Jan3 | ||
S Dec 30, 2021 at 17:58 | |||||
Dec 30, 2021 at 17:58 | vote | accept | Jan3 | ||
S Dec 30, 2021 at 17:58 | |||||
Dec 30, 2021 at 17:47 | comment | added | Jan3 | @Daniel Hatton yes you are right. there is a feedback loop and some studies have looked at similar feedback loops but in different contexts. | |
Dec 28, 2021 at 21:03 | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | Are you using a correlation to infer causation? | |
Dec 28, 2021 at 20:21 | answer | added | Buffy | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 28, 2021 at 19:59 | answer | added | Ethan Bolker | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 28, 2021 at 19:23 | comment | added | user128581 | But there's not actually any contradiction between those two propositions. If both are true at once, that's an example of a positive feedback loop, which I'd expect to be very common in Economics. | |
Dec 28, 2021 at 18:07 | comment | added | lalala | What do you think is the reason the other paper found the opposite effect? Is your effect Rock solid in the sense you want to put out your head to challenge current wisdom, or is it just 'meh, a little'. | |
S Dec 28, 2021 at 18:02 | review | First questions | |||
Dec 28, 2021 at 19:44 | |||||
S Dec 28, 2021 at 18:02 | history | asked | Jan3 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |