Timeline for Copyright permissions vs fair use to include an image from Amazon
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 26, 2021 at 16:00 | comment | added | Buffy | @BobBrown, correct, but the OP should seek out the original source, which is very unlikely to be Amazon. Also, Amazon pages aren't necessarily stable. | |
Nov 26, 2021 at 15:46 | comment | added | djohn | @Buffy Understood, thank you for the correction! I really wasn't sure about it. | |
Nov 26, 2021 at 14:58 | vote | accept | WnGatRC456 | ||
Nov 26, 2021 at 14:27 | comment | added | Bob Brown | "Fair use" has to do with copyright. "Citation" has to do with giving credit. Even is an image can be used under the fair use doctrine, you should still cite it, giving credit to the source of the image. | |
Nov 26, 2021 at 14:11 | answer | added | Buffy | timeline score: 2 | |
Nov 26, 2021 at 13:53 | comment | added | Buffy | @djohn, your mechanism for copying is still copying and makes no difference under copyright law. Even with minor changes. An image can be considered a "complete work" even when embedded within another. | |
Nov 26, 2021 at 11:36 | comment | added | djohn | If you are in the US, the copyright laws will make life very difficult for you. Could you simply do a tracing of the CAD image on photoshop, or another software? If you create a traced image that is a little different from the original, and you credit the original image in your paper with a link, then you should be able to claim fair use. If that's not possible, then the amazon CAD image is almost certainly copyrighted to one of these entities: 1) its creator; 2) its manufacturer. Amazon sellers only get a license to display the image, but own no copyright. Note: I'm not a lawyer. | |
Nov 26, 2021 at 3:48 | history | edited | WnGatRC456 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
Nov 26, 2021 at 3:33 | history | asked | WnGatRC456 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |