Timeline for Why do papers sometimes appear unlinked in Google Scholar?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2014 at 10:34 | history | edited | ff524 |
edited tags
|
|
| S Nov 23, 2014 at 20:47 | history | suggested | TRiG | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
The saliant point is that it's not a link, not that it's black. Also, added image description.
|
| Nov 23, 2014 at 20:34 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 23, 2014 at 20:47 | |||||
| Mar 7, 2014 at 7:50 | comment | added | Educ | @@CharlesMorisset Academia is a question and answer site for academics of all levels That's why i asked my question here. @mkennedy Thanks | |
| Mar 6, 2014 at 11:20 | comment | added | user102 | @Sverre: The question refers to the (absence of) choice of color by Google to display non-linked text. | |
| Mar 6, 2014 at 11:15 | comment | added | Sverre | @CharlesMorisset It's about a tool that's designed for people in academia, and a tool that's used on a daily basis by people in academia. Hence, it's about academia. | |
| Mar 6, 2014 at 9:57 | comment | added | ShreevatsaR | It's black because that's the default colour for text on the page. It's black because it isn't blue, and it isn't blue because it isn't a link, and it isn't a link because there's nothing to link to. | |
| Mar 6, 2014 at 1:38 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/441387223058243584 | ||
| Mar 5, 2014 at 22:38 | comment | added | mkennedy | As far as I can tell, the 1992 publication didn't occur (if the Wiley-published Journal of the same name (at the time) is the same journal). | |
| Mar 5, 2014 at 22:27 | comment | added | mkennedy | From Olivier Faure's thesis: Faure O.[90], Numerical Pathwise Approximation of Stochastic Differential Equations, Preprint LAMM 90/7, 1990. A paraître dans Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, 1992. pastel.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/52/32/58/PDF/… | |
| Mar 5, 2014 at 22:03 | comment | added | user102 | @Sverre: I downvoted the question because it's not really about academia, it's about the way a tool from Google works. | |
| Mar 5, 2014 at 21:58 | history | edited | badroit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
rewritten for grammar, phrasing, spelling, etc. -- also added tags
|
| Mar 5, 2014 at 20:53 | comment | added | Sverre | The downvoter should explain the downvote. The question seems totally legit and to the point. | |
| Mar 5, 2014 at 19:07 | vote | accept | Educ | ||
| Mar 5, 2014 at 18:56 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 6, 2014 at 0:11 | |||||
| Mar 5, 2014 at 18:55 | history | edited | aeismail | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body; edited title
|
| Mar 5, 2014 at 18:43 | answer | added | badroit | timeline score: 35 | |
| Mar 5, 2014 at 18:37 | history | asked | Educ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |