Timeline for Is there a problem with "non-publisher" journals?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2021 at 8:00 | comment | added | Sylvain Ribault | See also this question: academia.stackexchange.com/questions/151871/… | |
| Nov 5, 2021 at 2:36 | answer | added | ZeroTheHero | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 5, 2021 at 2:01 | comment | added | Allure | Does this answer your question? academia.stackexchange.com/questions/63951/… Even though it's not the same question, Fortnite's answer seems very applicable. | |
| Nov 4, 2021 at 22:49 | comment | added | Federico Poloni | @Buffy Publishers don't review papers. Unpaid editors and referees do. | |
| Nov 4, 2021 at 21:41 | answer | added | paul garrett | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 4, 2021 at 17:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 17, 2021 at 3:47 | |||||
| Nov 4, 2021 at 15:54 | comment | added | Jon Custer | @Buffy - I would suggest that the review process is central to the gatekeeping... | |
| Nov 4, 2021 at 15:53 | comment | added | Buffy | @JonCuster, publishers are more than gatekeepers. The review process adds value and reduces the necessity for every reader to re-verify every paper. But you probably have the core of an answer. | |
| Nov 4, 2021 at 15:51 | comment | added | henning no longer feeds AI | What is a "non-publisher journal"? | |
| Nov 4, 2021 at 15:43 | comment | added | Jon Custer | The web is filled with self published material. Most of it is worse than useless. For better or worse, gatekeepers are needed to increase the signal to noise level. | |
| Nov 4, 2021 at 15:36 | history | asked | mavavilj | CC BY-SA 4.0 |