Timeline for How to respond to senior academics after a public 'punching down' session
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2021 at 23:52 | comment | added | Ben | In that case I would just ignore it; sometimes reviewers/academics make erroneous criticisms. | |
| Aug 16, 2021 at 23:08 | comment | added | Tom | Thanks for your reply. I am hoping your first point is correct (and will be giving them the benefit of the doubt in this case). They are quite senior in the project and it had been developed over a number of years which is why I made the assumption, but no doubt they are very busy and probably hadn't thought through the details and were now speaking their concerns aloud for the first time. In terms of critisism, I am very open to ideas on ways to improve, but I didn't find any of the critisism useful, rather it was mostly negative. | |
| Aug 16, 2021 at 21:09 | history | answered | Ben | CC BY-SA 4.0 |