Timeline for How to salvage a rejected paper when you don't have time to correct it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2012 at 13:13 | vote | accept | Paul | ||
| S May 27, 2012 at 16:09 | history | suggested | Paul | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
correct minor grammatical mistake in first paragraph
|
| May 27, 2012 at 15:31 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 27, 2012 at 16:09 | |||||
| May 27, 2012 at 0:57 | history | edited | Dave Clarke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 269 characters in body
|
| May 27, 2012 at 0:56 | comment | added | Dave Clarke | That's actually a good approach. Get help. I'll integrate that into my answer. | |
| May 27, 2012 at 0:55 | comment | added | Paul | I had a thought about collaborating with a colleague of mine who has the knowledge and time to run the tests suggested by the reviewers. Does it make sense to approach it this way? | |
| May 27, 2012 at 0:41 | history | answered | Dave Clarke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |