Timeline for Informing advisors on a tangential sole-authored paper
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 20, 2021 at 9:06 | comment | added | algebraic__invariant | @RamPadmanabhan Re(1): I think most of what I said is universal to all STEM fields, even though there might be slight differences in cultures. Re(2): Even in math, in some subfields conferences are a big deal. What I'm saying is: You probably can't accurately rate the quality of your paper, and the quality of conferences/journals it should be submitted to. Re(3): If you have some research publication already, (as it seemed from your question), another one might not make a big difference - you've shown you can do reseach already. But you need letters of rec as well, so don't annoy your mentors. | |
Jul 19, 2021 at 17:40 | comment | added | Ilkka Törmä | I'd like to add to the second-to-last paragraph that a paper combining topics A and B should ideally be written so that both experts on A and experts on B can understand it and see its relevance. Both professors could help with this. | |
Jul 19, 2021 at 12:11 | comment | added | user136193 | A few points I wish to respond to: (1) The field isn't mathematics, it's a subfield of electrical engineering. (2) Some conferences are a fairly big deal in electrical engineering, similar to CS and unlike math. (3) I wish to get it submitted a little early because I will apply for Ph.D. programs in Dec. 2022, and getting this published will make a significantly positive impact on my profile. | |
Jul 19, 2021 at 10:32 | review | First posts | |||
Jul 19, 2021 at 10:37 | |||||
Jul 19, 2021 at 10:26 | history | answered | algebraic__invariant | CC BY-SA 4.0 |