Timeline for If the status date does not change while an article is under review, does it mean things aren't moving along?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2021 at 1:34 | answer | added | Allure | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 15, 2021 at 21:20 | answer | added | Wolfgang Bangerth | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 15, 2021 at 20:16 | comment | added | Federico Poloni | Actually the main cause of delays isn't reviewers declining; it's reviewers ghosting editors and not giving an answer, even after two-three weeks and multiple reminders. | |
| Jun 15, 2021 at 18:17 | comment | added | Richard Erickson | Elsevier's system varies between journals. Also, they have 2 different platforms for journal management, depending upon the journal. | |
| Jun 15, 2021 at 18:03 | comment | added | RegressForward | How long is a "very long time"? It is not unusual to take a month or two before you get through the desk, depending on discipline and journal. | |
| Jun 15, 2021 at 17:49 | history | asked | NominalSystems | CC BY-SA 4.0 |