Timeline for Why do some textbooks lack the 'references section' completely?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2021 at 21:52 | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | @Anyon OP also posted here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/4163398/… Comments there would agree. | |
| Jun 4, 2021 at 21:13 | comment | added | Sachin | @Anyon Could be a possibility. But maybe someone has even deeper knowledge about it. Hence the question :) | |
| Jun 4, 2021 at 21:03 | comment | added | Anyon | @SachinMotwani Not having access to Grewal's book, there's a good chance I'm misunderstanding you here. But 'falting' is sometimes used as a synonym for convolution. I think this comes from the German word for convolution, "Faltung", (or the Swedish 'faltning') - not from Falting's theorem in arithmetic geometry. | |
| Jun 4, 2021 at 20:15 | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | @SachinMotwani "What should I do in such cases?" - perhaps ask about it on a relevant SE site? It's always even possible the words you are looking at involve a typo or other mistake and someone familiar would recognize it as such. There have been a few such questions on Biology.SE. | |
| Jun 4, 2021 at 20:13 | comment | added | Sachin | For clarity on my previous comment Convolution has been put synonymous to falting , which I now know comes from the faltings's theorem . But not well explained there. Hence wanted to see the reference. [B. S. Grewal, Ed. 44, p.p. 748] | |
| Jun 4, 2021 at 20:09 | comment | added | Sachin | I understand your point. But I did my homework. I did google the term. It seems not much work has been done to combine the two words written in conjunction in this book so casually (only at one place, but in bold). | |
| Jun 4, 2021 at 20:05 | history | answered | Buffy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |