Timeline for duplicate published data figure
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2021 at 15:43 | history | edited | Anh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 89 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2021 at 15:20 | answer | added | Bryan Krause♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 26, 2021 at 15:04 | comment | added | Anh | Last time, I published two papers in two different journals, I used the same method, same object but discussed different topics. Paper 2 was submitted several months after paper 1 is online. But editor from the paper 2 sent back the manuscript to me and said paper 2 has many parts similar to paper 1. it is somewhat similar above situation. And I had to remodify the paper, cite the data in paper 1 in the figure of paper 2 | |
| Mar 26, 2021 at 14:57 | comment | added | Anh | yes, they mentioned paper 1 in the introduction. But in the discussion result, no citation or statement about the data has been published in paper1. Because of the same numerical condition with the same method, So I think the data must be the same | |
| Mar 26, 2021 at 14:54 | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | Do they at least reference paper 1 in paper 2? If these are simulated data, there is not much point in indicating they are the same if it's already indicated that they have been generated the same way, in my opinion. Though also the authors might have been in a tricky position if they've submitted both papers at about the same time. Maybe more importantly - why do you care, specifically? | |
| Mar 26, 2021 at 14:44 | history | asked | Anh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |