Timeline for How does Clarivate incentivise journals to market Publons?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2021 at 1:57 | comment | added | Anonymous Physicist | @JenB academia.stackexchange.com/questions/94309/… Opinions vary. | |
| Mar 8, 2021 at 0:04 | comment | added | JenB | @AnonymousPhysicist How is Publons completely useless? I use it and recommend it to other postdocs because it helps me keep track of numbers of reviews and what journals, which is all part of the job hunting CV | |
| Mar 7, 2021 at 21:25 | comment | added | Anonymous Physicist | @anpami I do not see how association with the completely useless Publons benefits MDPI's reputation. | |
| Mar 7, 2021 at 18:03 | comment | added | Snijderfrey | I am not sure if there is a point in trying to understand the e-mail activities of MDPI. They send an awful amount of e-mails dealing with all kinds of things, and I cannot see any strategy behind it that makes sense. | |
| Mar 7, 2021 at 11:05 | comment | added | anpami | I am not sure whether it really is Clarivate that tries to market its Publons via MDPI. My guess would be different. I could imagine that MDPI tries to strategically put off its image as a non-serious publisher by displaying itself as a peer review-cherishing entity. And this commitment may seem more credible when MDPI embraces Publons so ostentatiously. | |
| Mar 7, 2021 at 6:19 | history | asked | Anonymous Physicist | CC BY-SA 4.0 |