Skip to main content
28 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 28, 2021 at 19:41 vote accept etal
Mar 9, 2021 at 4:25 answer added John Smith timeline score: 1
Mar 8, 2021 at 20:03 comment added Elizabeth Henning You waited five months to tell him that you weren't happy with his progress? Why?
Mar 8, 2021 at 16:38 comment added cheersmate I see. If you're required to teach them the "basics of ML", maybe the student didn't have sufficient background knowledge to begin with.
Mar 8, 2021 at 15:34 comment added etal @cheersmate I agree it was a mistake. This was only during the Summer when I thought he was working full time and I was teaching him the basics of ML, but in hindsight it was a mistake. Now we're only meeting 1-2x per week, as with any other of my mentees.
Mar 8, 2021 at 15:32 comment added etal @FourierFlux w.r.t. papers vs grades, it probably differs between universities and fields. The first instruction I got for grading PhD applicants was "Don't look at grades", the second about rec letters, the third was "Almost always require at least a paper submission". On the other point, if I just wanted to benefit from students work, I would just supervise 10+ undegrads from the US university or exploit extremely motivated international students from countries with immigration caps that send me emails about interning at our lab. Unfortunately, both have been done before in my department...
Mar 8, 2021 at 15:24 history edited etal CC BY-SA 4.0
forgot to add learning benefits
Mar 8, 2021 at 14:56 comment added Michael Richardson I'm not sure what "exploitative" is referencing in the question or body.
Mar 8, 2021 at 7:34 comment added cheersmate You meet 5x per week? When is the student supposed to get work done?
Mar 8, 2021 at 3:04 history edited etal CC BY-SA 4.0
a bit more precise
Mar 8, 2021 at 0:05 comment added heretoinfinity I have met people who freeze because they either don't find the project interesting or they have too many questions that they fear they can't ask or a combination of both.
Mar 7, 2021 at 22:10 comment added Robbie Goodwin Without pressuring him too much into doing work, why would you not just explain to him what you don't like about how he's doing what, and what he needs to change?
Mar 7, 2021 at 19:23 comment added FourierFlux Sounds like you're wanting to benefit from his work more than anything else. Idk about "top" but I entered into PhD without any research. Grades usually matter more than a paper which didn't really do anything significant.
Mar 7, 2021 at 17:56 answer added Stilez timeline score: 2
Mar 7, 2021 at 17:56 answer added user104446 timeline score: 11
Mar 7, 2021 at 17:40 answer added JAmes timeline score: 20
Mar 7, 2021 at 14:10 answer added Mike timeline score: 0
Mar 7, 2021 at 12:37 comment added Kimball One thing to consider is the pandemic affects different people in different ways.
Mar 7, 2021 at 12:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1368531900621594624
Mar 7, 2021 at 8:13 answer added Dan Romik timeline score: 56
Mar 7, 2021 at 7:12 history became hot network question
Mar 7, 2021 at 6:34 answer added Kevin Miller timeline score: 14
Mar 7, 2021 at 5:32 history edited cag51 CC BY-SA 4.0
more descriptive title
Mar 7, 2021 at 3:56 answer added cag51 timeline score: 55
Mar 7, 2021 at 0:28 comment added Daniel R. Collins Re: "I will have to write him a letter of recommendation in the Fall" -- Why? Consensus around here seems to be never do that, just decline to write the letter instead. E.g.: academia.stackexchange.com/questions/137391/…
Mar 7, 2021 at 0:24 answer added user135405 timeline score: 31
Mar 6, 2021 at 23:54 comment added user133933 How sure are you that he's not working with someone else and stringing you along as a backup plan?
Mar 6, 2021 at 23:11 history asked etal CC BY-SA 4.0