Timeline for Mention impact factor or conference acceptance rate in CV
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2020 at 14:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Nov 17, 2014 at 8:50 | comment | added | OK- | Excellent point re (over) reliance on IF to evaluate one's own research. | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 12:53 | history | post merged (destination) | |||
| Jan 18, 2014 at 19:00 | history | edited | David Ketcheson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 779 characters in body
|
| Jan 18, 2014 at 17:50 | comment | added | Calimo | @xLeitix that's a good point. In this case I indeed want to maximise my chances over passing a political message, and the agency I'm submitting to hasn't signed the DORA. | |
| Jan 18, 2014 at 17:32 | comment | added | xLeitix | I feel this is a nice political statement (and I even agree that IFs are largely bogus for judging individual papers), but this is, I think, pretty bad advice. The chance that a reviewer feels so strongly about IFs that (s)he holds reporting them against the candidate seems very small in comparison to the potential upside of having a reviewer that values IFs. | |
| Jan 18, 2014 at 13:57 | history | answered | David Ketcheson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |