Sometimes we may ask questions on stack exchange or online forums wherein the response is helpful or even essential to a piece of work that gets published in an academic journal. If this occurs, how should credit be given to those involved in the exchange? Should they all be included as authors? Should a link to the forum be included as a reference in the paper?

Once something is in a stack exchange or forum, it's "published". Perhaps in the future the current peer review model will transform into people writing blogs and posting in forums and databases. But for now, how might this issue be dealt with while forums, blogs, etc coexist with journals?

Sometimes we may ask questions on stack exchange or online forums wherein the response is helpful or even essential to a piece of work that gets published in an academic journal. If this occurs, how should credit be given to those involved in the exchange? Should they all be included as authors? Should a link to the forum be included as a reference in the paper?

Once something is in a stack exchange or forum, it's "published". Perhaps in the future, the current peer review model will transform into people writing blogs and posting in forums and databases. But for now, how might this issue be dealt with while forums, blogs, etc coexist with journals?

Sometimes we may ask questions on stack exchange or other online forums wherein the response is helpful or even essential to a piece of work that gets published in an academic journal. If this occurs, how should credit be given to those involved in the exchange? Should they all be included as authors? Should a link to the forum be included as a reference in the paper?

It seems to me that this issue makes the current pre-publication editing and peer review process quite awkward. Once it's in a forum, it's "published". Peer review occurs after publication and perhaps most interestingly with respect to the politics of science: everyone is their own editor. In any case, how might this issue be dealt with now while we have forums, which are in some sense politically useless from the perspective of the question answerer in academia (i.e. probably very little that you publish on a forum will yet directly help you get a job or keep one), and journals? The value of sincerity and openness in sharing knowledge seems intuitively priceless to the success of science. But, in this light, the prevailing political system governing scientific interaction seems hopelessly pathological. That I even feel the need to ask this question, seems to me at least one piece of evidence of the latter.

Sometimes we may ask questions on stack exchange or online forums wherein the response is helpful or even essential to a piece of work that gets published in an academic journal. If this occurs, how should credit be given to those involved in the exchange? Should they all be included as authors? Should a link to the forum be included as a reference in the paper?

Once something is in a stack exchange or forum, it's "published". Perhaps in the future the current peer review model will transform into people writing blogs and posting in forums and databases. But for now, how might this issue be dealt with while forums, blogs, etc coexist with journals?