Timeline for Can I predict the fate of my manuscript (from information other than a decision letter)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2023 at 14:42 | history | edited | Allure | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 677 characters in body
|
| Aug 14, 2020 at 19:20 | comment | added | Alexander Woo | I've had a short paper accepted without review - but the editor was an expert in the area. | |
| Aug 14, 2020 at 13:54 | comment | added | Allure | @lighthousekeeper academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82764/… | |
| Aug 14, 2020 at 12:42 | comment | added | Buffy | I think the conclusions of Watson & Crick were already widely known prior to submission. The case is non-typical, as is the action of the editor, as you say. | |
| Aug 14, 2020 at 11:38 | comment | added | lighthouse keeper | One might add that Watson & Crick's paper was in 1953, almost 70 years ago. I wonder if there are more recent examples. | |
| Aug 14, 2020 at 10:47 | history | answered | Allure | CC BY-SA 4.0 |