Timeline for Decision to peer-review a paper by author who does not believe in acknowledging reviewers
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2020 at 15:34 | comment | added | Dan Romik | Is someone who only publishes good science “just a taker” who doesn’t “give back to the scientific community”? This seems like an odd characterization. | |
| Mar 24, 2020 at 11:44 | comment | added | Buffy | @AnonymousPhysicist, I'm pretty sure they can deal with it. | |
| Mar 24, 2020 at 10:44 | comment | added | Anonymous Physicist | This will annoy most editors. | |
| Mar 23, 2020 at 16:37 | history | edited | Buffy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
| Mar 23, 2020 at 15:46 | comment | added | z8081 | Good points, thank you. For the record, although my recommendation at the time was for minor revisions, that just meant no extra experiment (or anything really major) was required, however I did correct multiple mistakes, thus the paper was definitely improved. I could have mentioned that in the question, which might have justified why I felt surprised the authors took all of that for granted, but might have sounded too much like blowing my own trumpet. | |
| Mar 23, 2020 at 14:34 | history | answered | Buffy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |