Timeline for My research was plagiarised and won best paper of a conference. How to proceed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 8, 2019 at 6:41 | vote | accept | user1998012 | ||
Nov 6, 2019 at 10:25 | comment | added | Alchimista | All this type of questions rise doubs. I really met people who were deeply convinced of their ideas/data to have been stolen with absolutely no ground for that :) this in a very good answer as it covers several facets. | |
Nov 5, 2019 at 13:44 | comment | added | Spark | It sounds like your advisor is not putting their best efforts when considering you and your research (or at the very least you seem to believe this, which is the same for all intents and purposes). I would suggest having a serious talk with them, and an introspection regarding your own prospects with them. | |
Nov 5, 2019 at 11:10 | comment | added | user1998012 | Thanks for your answer. My advisor agrees that there was plagiarism, but he criticized my work throughout my PhD and never let me publish it. My research is more complex and do much more deep analysis than the paper published by the other group. I can blame this is my advisor's fault for never let me publish it, but another research group stealing my research is such a bad move from them. My advisor was telling me he is not sure he want to work with them again. | |
Nov 5, 2019 at 3:52 | history | edited | Spark | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 889 characters in body
|
Nov 5, 2019 at 3:16 | history | answered | Spark | CC BY-SA 4.0 |