Timeline for If I refereed a paper at one journal (and it was rejected) should I referee it again when it's sent to another journal?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2018 at 22:32 | comment | added | Oleg Lobachev | There are a lot of anecdotes along the line "I am now reviewing this paper for the fourth time, I rejected it previously all the time, and any bit of it had not changed since then." | |
| Oct 15, 2017 at 21:19 | comment | added | Mark | Ask the editor. Often journals share information about reviewers (if they agree) and even share reviews (again, if they have agreed to that). Therefore it might be the editors desire that you review the manuscript again. | |
| Apr 30, 2015 at 2:03 | answer | added | Mark Joshi | timeline score: -1 | |
| Nov 7, 2013 at 18:57 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/398524698256224256 | ||
| Nov 7, 2013 at 15:53 | vote | accept | gammapoint | ||
| Nov 7, 2013 at 15:38 | comment | added | F'x | I think this may be a duplicate of “Asked again to review a paper, when the authors don't wish to modify it” | |
| Nov 7, 2013 at 14:23 | answer | added | Peter Jansson | timeline score: 25 | |
| Nov 7, 2013 at 14:06 | history | asked | gammapoint | CC BY-SA 3.0 |