Skip to main content

Timeline for Response to referee after rejection

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 16, 2019 at 0:55 comment added LSpice Without addressing the main question, I think one of the best, though also most galling, pieces of advice I ever received from a reviewer was: no matter how obvious you think it should be, if someone has to ask about it, it's not as obvious as you think it is. (More pithily: better to say more than is necessary to ensure clarity rather than less.)
Oct 15, 2019 at 21:21 comment added user23658 I removed that part on my question since it was confusing and did not add anything useful information. I meant that my coauthors agree that it should not be necessary to explicitly state this referee's assumption is incorrect: we feel it is apparent from our main results.
Oct 15, 2019 at 21:18 history edited user23658 CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 51 characters in body
Oct 15, 2019 at 19:28 comment added LSpice "I should also mention, any future submission would explicitly state that this assumption is incorrect (even though all authors agree its clearly untrue)"—what is 'it' in "its [sic] clearly untrue"? Is it untrue that the assumption is incorrect (which is what you seem to be saying), or is the assumption itself incorrect (in which case "even though" does not seem to belong)?
Oct 14, 2019 at 6:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1183623619341103104
Oct 14, 2019 at 5:22 history became hot network question
Oct 14, 2019 at 4:07 answer added Wolfgang Bangerth timeline score: 43
Oct 13, 2019 at 21:47 vote accept user23658
Oct 13, 2019 at 21:34 answer added Dan Romik timeline score: 58
Oct 13, 2019 at 21:29 history edited user23658 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 58 characters in body
Oct 13, 2019 at 21:22 history edited user23658 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 25 characters in body
Oct 13, 2019 at 21:15 history asked user23658 CC BY-SA 4.0