Timeline for Will a paper be retracted if a flaw in released software code invalidates its central idea?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2019 at 19:38 | comment | added | nabla | Sure. But "should" does not mean that it is always done. There is heaps of semi-abondoned PhD-ware out there, which has formed the basis of papers. | |
| Aug 8, 2019 at 21:50 | comment | added | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten | For any non-trivial code you should be doing the first two bullet points for your future self. They don't count as effort needed to publish the code. To that same category I would add writing a least a basic test suite. | |
| Aug 7, 2019 at 15:15 | history | answered | nabla | CC BY-SA 4.0 |