Timeline for Where to find computer science conferences which accept engineering work?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2019 at 12:50 | comment | added | BrianH | @chickensoup Basically by talking to them and your advisor and asking them about their experience and for advice. Ideally they would offer some useful, informed next direction steps, preferably in more detail than you could find in any paper, especially if that's not something they will be working on themselves - sort of "pick up where they left off". Won't know until you talk with them, ideally you would be able to come up with multiple options so you can pick one that seems better for your goals and skills. It doesn't always work, but in many groups its the best strategy. | |
| May 23, 2019 at 8:46 | comment | added | chickensoup | You said that "instead focus on the lower-hanging fruit of being closer to the work your group does", for the case the existing researcher are leaving after graduation, how do I know which direction is still have some weakness (some hole, gap) to exploit (improve) (of course base on that reason to) publish? | |
| May 22, 2019 at 11:31 | vote | accept | chickensoup | ||
| May 20, 2019 at 16:31 | history | answered | BrianH | CC BY-SA 4.0 |