Timeline for Who deserves to be first and second author? PhD student who collected data, research associate who wrote the paper or supervisor?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2019 at 15:35 | comment | added | luk32 | This doesn't solve the problem at all. The problem is to establish contribution relationship. The point is not to be 1st on the name list, but to be recognized as the principal researcher for the problem. In fields with alphabetical ordering, the order doesn't mean a thing and the lead author is recognized by other means. So, unfortunately this is not an answer to the question. | |
| Mar 12, 2019 at 15:25 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Mar 12, 2019 at 16:35 | |||||
| Mar 12, 2019 at 15:24 | comment | added | Ian | While your opinion might be valid, this site is not about exchanging opinions. Your answer does not contribute to OP's problem. | |
| Mar 12, 2019 at 14:57 | comment | added | penelope | While it might or might not be beneficial to switch to this system within all the disciplines, I do not see it happening in the next few days/months, and as such I really don't see how it answers the OPs question or resolves his situation at all. | |
| Mar 12, 2019 at 14:13 | comment | added | Michael Richardson | Professor Aabenraa agrees... :) | |
| Mar 12, 2019 at 14:05 | comment | added | layman | I agree! That's how it is in my discipline. Really helps to calm down the ego problem some people have. :) | |
| Mar 12, 2019 at 13:29 | history | answered | Daisuke Aramaki | CC BY-SA 4.0 |