Timeline for Changing some part of the paper after getting accepted for a conference
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2019 at 10:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Mar 12, 2019 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1105574316295499776 | ||
| Mar 12, 2019 at 10:37 | comment | added | Alchimista | Ok then following author recommendations is required. Likely the paper will be sent to referee again. I would personally point to the editor/conference board that following the referees resulted in a substantially different paper too. According to the description you made, I suppose the title can be different too. | |
| Mar 12, 2019 at 10:28 | comment | added | Yacine | In most (if not all) CS conferences, authors submit their entire works (similarly to journal submission). | |
| Mar 12, 2019 at 10:13 | comment | added | Alchimista | Unclear. It seems you are going to write another paper. Also in my field submitting a paper to a conference means submitting an abstract, so I don't understand if acceptance refers to you presenting your results at the conference or really a proceeding must be sent along. Normally these are separated processes. | |
| Mar 12, 2019 at 9:08 | history | edited | Yacine | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Giving more details.
|
| Mar 12, 2019 at 8:38 | answer | added | user2768 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 12, 2019 at 7:24 | history | asked | Yacine | CC BY-SA 4.0 |