Timeline for What makes papers publishable in top-tier journals?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2019 at 17:42 | comment | added | Peter - Reinstate Monica | @ElectronicToothpick Now it's obvious! ;-) | |
| Feb 26, 2019 at 16:27 | comment | added | ElectronicToothpick | @Peter I was actually making a reference to the P vs NP problem :) | |
| Feb 26, 2019 at 14:07 | comment | added | Peter - Reinstate Monica | @ElectronicToothpick It's called The Lone Star or Boris Johnson Conjecture. It's much easier to recognize a good secession than to produce one. As a corrolary aside, many people think doing things on their own instead of the usual pedestrian collaboration would yield beautiful results but examples are few and far between. | |
| Feb 26, 2019 at 13:39 | comment | added | ElectronicToothpick | @Peter If you can prove that hunch and write a paper about it I'm sure it will be accepted in every top-tier journal ;) | |
| Feb 26, 2019 at 7:50 | comment | added | Peter - Reinstate Monica | My hunch is that producing a good paper is much harder than recognizing one. One path to a good paper is collaboration with good people. Then you'll also know where you stand and what quality your work has. The loner who produces amazing results during the 20 years they didn't leave the house do exist, but they are untypical. | |
| Feb 25, 2019 at 14:21 | history | answered | user68958 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |