Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 18, 2019 at 15:02 comment added Noah Snyder I really want to give trolling answers about journals that used to be run by scientists and were purchased by predatory multinationals like Elsevier.
Feb 18, 2019 at 12:59 history edited Robert Columbia CC BY-SA 4.0
Add examples of acceptable evidence
Feb 12, 2019 at 3:23 comment added Melanie Shebel Upvote just for the Spline Reticulation joke... and it's an interesting question.
Feb 12, 2019 at 3:01 history tweeted twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1095155917086179333
Feb 11, 2019 at 21:14 answer added Allure timeline score: 28
Feb 11, 2019 at 20:26 answer added iayork timeline score: 6
Feb 11, 2019 at 20:20 comment added Prof. Santa Claus Hindawi has shoddy practices. Example: the text sent by my colleague for a call for special issue was plagiarised by Hindawi's staff for a different special issue.
Feb 11, 2019 at 20:13 comment added user68958 Hindawi's journals were on the Beall's List too, if I remember correctly. Since then they upgraded and while are not high-class, as far as I know they are not considered predatory.
Feb 11, 2019 at 20:09 comment added Robert Columbia @CaptainEmacs right, I'm talking about a light side/dark side-type switch. Simply gaining prestige over time through hard work or losing it gradually due to laziness is just life.
Feb 11, 2019 at 20:03 history edited Robert Columbia CC BY-SA 4.0
Add example
Feb 11, 2019 at 20:02 answer added FuzzyLeapfrog timeline score: 21
Feb 11, 2019 at 19:59 comment added Captain Emacs Very cool question. I am looking forward to the answers. Journals have lost quality, but turning to the dark side entirely would be really interesting...
Feb 11, 2019 at 19:51 history asked Robert Columbia CC BY-SA 4.0