Timeline for In a camera ready paper (has been accepted), how to cite my own paper that is still under blind review?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2020 at 14:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Feb 15, 2019 at 12:53 | comment | added | Stefan | @xmp125a I understand your consern, but the reference to own, unpublished results does not violate the blind review, as there is a difference between the results you have obtained in your study, and the (attempt) to publish them. In my opinion, you own the results, and the journal (more or less) owns the published work. I realise that it is not, in practise, so clear-cut as I have descibed here. | |
| Feb 15, 2019 at 12:46 | comment | added | xmp125a | NO. You don't do that! Not if subject to double blind review! You have to take care that you cite yourself as a 3rd person in a very neutral tone that will NOT reveal that you are actually citing yourself. Now, if the paper is under review, only authors would know that and then even this does not help. The question here is not "unpublished work" but double blind review rules! | |
| Feb 10, 2019 at 7:52 | history | answered | Stefan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |