Timeline for How to reference studies mentioned in a paper without having to read the original papers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2013 at 6:47 | comment | added | JRN | Related: academia.stackexchange.com/q/13305/64 | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 15:05 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 3, 2013 at 17:31 | |||||
| Sep 3, 2013 at 14:44 | comment | added | apsillers | Possible duplicate: What's the correct way to cite a paper cited by another paper?; there is also a cross-style review of indirect reference at academia.stackexchange.com/a/7776/5920. | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 10:43 | answer | added | PhilDin | timeline score: 11 | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 2:43 | comment | added | 410 gone | I'm starting to notice a pattern in your questions ... they're all about seeking any shortcuts instead of doing a thorough literature review. This is a very bad strategy, that risks leaving you with patchy, incomplete, incoherent knowledge. | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 2:01 | comment | added | JeffE | Don't. Just read the original papers. | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 1:17 | history | edited | Jeromy Anglim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Sep 3, 2013 at 1:16 | answer | added | Jeromy Anglim | timeline score: 13 | |
| Sep 3, 2013 at 0:16 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/374687425458872320 | ||
| Sep 2, 2013 at 21:08 | vote | accept | Kaser | ||
| Sep 2, 2013 at 20:53 | answer | added | Jim | timeline score: 23 | |
| Sep 2, 2013 at 20:47 | history | edited | aeismail | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed redundancy.
|
| Sep 2, 2013 at 20:26 | history | edited | Peter Jansson |
retag
|
|
| Sep 2, 2013 at 20:25 | answer | added | Peter Jansson | timeline score: 24 | |
| Sep 2, 2013 at 20:21 | history | asked | Kaser | CC BY-SA 3.0 |