Timeline for Application of standard techniques to new data: is it publishable?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2013 at 19:59 | comment | added | user7130 | @jhoyla I edited in a suggestion to consider doing a company white paper | |
| Sep 2, 2013 at 19:20 | comment | added | user7130 | @jhoyla that could be a paper based on a validation of the method. | |
| Sep 2, 2013 at 19:19 | history | edited | user7130 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 70 characters in body
|
| Sep 2, 2013 at 16:13 | comment | added | jhoyla | The 'new' bit would be that I am the first to actually do the analysis. The new result I guess is 'Everything's fine. Nothing is wrong.' I'm not sure that's enough for a paper. | |
| Sep 2, 2013 at 15:42 | comment | added | aeismail | Then what's actually new, if you're not generating new methods or producing new information and insights? | |
| Sep 2, 2013 at 13:04 | comment | added | jhoyla | I'm not applying new techniques or producing new results so does the research count as novel? | |
| Sep 2, 2013 at 10:27 | history | answered | user7130 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |