Timeline for How to cite my own submitted but not yet published work?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2021 at 7:26 | answer | added | Joris Guerin | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 19, 2016 at 21:41 | history | edited | ff524 |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 18, 2016 at 6:57 | answer | added | Eilia | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 26, 2013 at 0:15 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/371788028672741376 | ||
| Aug 24, 2013 at 8:40 | vote | accept | Sibbs Gambling | ||
| Aug 24, 2013 at 8:28 | comment | added | Benoît Kloeckner | My point is indeed that the referee have to have access to the paper needed to read the paper under review. arXiv is a good solution, if it is ok with your conference, as suggested by some answers. | |
| Aug 24, 2013 at 1:25 | comment | added | Sibbs Gambling | @BenoîtKloeckner But as I said, their deadlines are roughly the same. By no point, you mean the reviewers will have difficulties finding the paper? If that is the case, will arXiv fix that? | |
| Aug 23, 2013 at 21:48 | comment | added | Benoît Kloeckner | I definitely do not see the point of citing an unavailable paper. As you do not repeat the part of A that would also belong to B, the first thing you have to do is to make A available before submitting B. How would the referees do their work otherwise? After that, citing is an issue easily settled. | |
| Aug 23, 2013 at 19:10 | answer | added | SteveK | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 23, 2013 at 14:28 | answer | added | user8346 | timeline score: 8 | |
| Aug 23, 2013 at 8:03 | answer | added | silvado | timeline score: 36 | |
| Aug 23, 2013 at 6:57 | answer | added | aeismail | timeline score: 12 | |
| Aug 23, 2013 at 4:41 | history | asked | Sibbs Gambling | CC BY-SA 3.0 |