Timeline for How are scientific papers uniquely identified?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2018 at 5:38 | comment | added | Nemo | @Agelos the link doesn't work, but yes, CORE does not create DOIs for items, it uses the DOIs assigned by publishers. | |
| Oct 26, 2018 at 17:33 | vote | accept | Agelos | ||
| Oct 26, 2018 at 17:01 | comment | added | Agelos | @Nemo This paper, for example, from CORE does not has a DOI. (core.ac.uk/display/…) | |
| Oct 25, 2018 at 7:29 | comment | added | NoDataDumpNoContribution | @Nav "Hopefully that'd make citations a lot easier." Not if it would be another DOI system that is adopted by only a fraction of the total market. Also, at least for me, author+journal+year is sufficiently unique and easier to remember than any qr code or string hash. Just imagine you would see string hashes printed on slides during a talk. The DOI is already quite good and maybe there is or one can do a QR code version of it. | |
| Oct 24, 2018 at 15:45 | comment | added | Nav | It'd actually be nice to have unique identifiers for research papers that are like QR codes or just a simple string hash of a limited length. Hopefully that'd make citations a lot easier. It's currently annoying to have to type out all author names, volume numbers, date of publication etc. | |
| Oct 23, 2018 at 14:06 | comment | added | Nemo | CORE and SemanticScholar definitely use DOIs, what do you mean that they don't? | |
| Oct 23, 2018 at 13:50 | history | edited | Anyon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body; edited title
|
| Oct 23, 2018 at 12:06 | comment | added | NoDataDumpNoContribution | "How are all scientific publications uniquely identified?" For citation usually by a combination of (title, journal, issue, pages, year, authors, doi, ...). | |
| Oct 23, 2018 at 12:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1054703988493484034 | ||
| Oct 23, 2018 at 9:04 | answer | added | ynnig | timeline score: 25 | |
| Oct 23, 2018 at 8:58 | comment | added | user2768 | I suggest revising (in the title and body) "How are all scientific publications uniquely identified ?" to "Are all scientific publications uniquely identifiable?" or "Is there a system to uniquely identify all scientific publications?" | |
| Oct 23, 2018 at 8:54 | answer | added | user2768 | timeline score: 19 | |
| Oct 23, 2018 at 8:46 | comment | added | Thomas Steinke | What makes you think such unique identifiers exist? | |
| Oct 23, 2018 at 8:09 | comment | added | origimbo | Are you looking for unique identification by authors, publishing houses, librarians or the world? | |
| Oct 23, 2018 at 7:30 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 23, 2018 at 7:46 | |||||
| Oct 23, 2018 at 7:29 | answer | added | henning no longer feeds AI | timeline score: 50 | |
| Oct 23, 2018 at 7:25 | history | asked | Agelos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |