Timeline for How to explain a physics mechanism that I study from other paper in my report while avoiding plagiarism?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2020 at 14:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Oct 17, 2018 at 19:15 | answer | added | Bryan Krause♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 17, 2018 at 18:51 | history | edited | Codelearner777 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 29 characters in body
|
| Oct 17, 2018 at 18:47 | answer | added | Buffy | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 17, 2018 at 18:19 | comment | added | Codelearner777 | @AloneProgrammer, how about the completeness of a report? Even though I know it cannot be 100% complete since it is not possible to paraphrase all the reference we use. I also worry if the supervisor think I am to lazy to think other way. other consequence is it make the report thinner. Yes, I need to fulfill a minimum number of pages. sorry if someone feels offended by this reason. | |
| Oct 17, 2018 at 18:19 | comment | added | Codelearner777 | @BryanKrause, no equation in the original source for this mechanism. | |
| Oct 17, 2018 at 18:12 | comment | added | Mithridates the Great | Your option 1 is very common in articles as well as thesis cause there is not much space to discuss every piece of details of a mechanism from scratch so you cannot argue about these kind of referring such as: "For complete description of mechanism readers are referred to [1] ". | |
| Oct 17, 2018 at 18:11 | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | Can this mechanism be summarized in an equation? | |
| Oct 17, 2018 at 18:10 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 17, 2018 at 18:15 | |||||
| Oct 17, 2018 at 18:08 | history | asked | Codelearner777 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |