Timeline for Are problems in PhD science labs not present in math phd research?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2018 at 5:14 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Aug 27, 2018 at 23:06 | comment | added | Azor Ahai -him- | Maybe I should ask a question "I like my supervisor and I'm getting a lot of good publications out. is this normal?" | |
| Aug 27, 2018 at 4:30 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 27, 2018 at 11:36 | |||||
| Aug 26, 2018 at 18:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1033776279928168448 | ||
| Aug 26, 2018 at 15:30 | answer | added | Nate Eldredge | timeline score: 16 | |
| Aug 26, 2018 at 15:23 | comment | added | Dave L Renfro | This probably also varies by country. That said, my experience in math programs in the U.S. is nothing at all like this (4 different graduate programs throughout the 1980s and early 1990s, and yes I realize this many is unusual). For one thing, virtually no one was involved with publishable research except maybe near the end, and generally people bent over backwards in trying to be fair, at least this was my impression. Probably the most noticeable behavior remotely like this is the sometimes hypermasculine competitiveness common in math. | |
| Aug 26, 2018 at 15:16 | comment | added | Massimo Ortolano | Beware of two things: first, this site collects questions about pathological cases and not questions from all labs where everything works ok and the advisors do answer the questions of their students and behave ethically; second, the word lab is here used not only denote a science lab with different pieces of equipment, but also a computer lab, where you have only computers, that is, a situation that can be close to that of a math researcher. | |
| Aug 26, 2018 at 15:08 | history | asked | user93132 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |