Timeline for Suggestions to turn an "accepted, pending revisions" into an "accepted"
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 6, 2018 at 17:01 | comment | added | Jamai-Con | @GEdgar: Thanks a lot for your answer. What would you say is a reasonable/typical lapse before the author receives a report on the revised version of the paper? | |
Sep 12, 2018 at 22:37 | vote | accept | Jamai-Con | ||
Jun 18, 2018 at 21:39 | comment | added | origimbo | @Jamai-Con for a "typical" journal in a "typical" field (if such a thing could exist) accepted, pending revisions strongly implies that the editor believes the requested changes are so non-controversial and so minor that the author will have no reason not to follow them. In that case, it's likely the editor will sign off on them without going back to the reviewers. If the If the push back is strong on anything, then that might cause another round of review, comment, respond. Serious disagreement might lead to a trawl for another independent reviewer if the workflow allows. | |
Jun 18, 2018 at 21:27 | comment | added | Jamai-Con | What if the author decides to waive one or two of the referee's suggested revision? Won't he/she get mad at the author and retaliate suggesting a rejection in the end? | |
Jun 18, 2018 at 21:04 | history | answered | GEdgar | CC BY-SA 4.0 |