Timeline for Can I correct a mistake that the reviewers didn't spot in a paper that has not been accepted yet?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
30 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2018 at 5:04 | history | edited | Allure | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Typo
|
| S Jun 11, 2018 at 20:52 | history | suggested | TRiG | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
I think that massive text was a markdown error: it was supposed to be a divider. Anyway, the last paragraph contributed little, and I removed it, inserting a clarification earlier instead.
|
| Jun 11, 2018 at 19:08 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 11, 2018 at 20:52 | |||||
| May 19, 2018 at 3:04 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 20, 2018 at 3:01 | |||||
| May 15, 2018 at 3:57 | comment | added | Nobody | Also, you first say the paper was accepted in the beginning of the question, then you say THE PAPER HAS NOT BEEN ACCEPTED at the end of the question, please clarify which case it is. | |
| May 15, 2018 at 3:45 | comment | added | Nobody | Possible duplicate Does correcting the data analysis when replying to a Major Revision make a bad impression on the editors and reviewers? | |
| May 14, 2018 at 19:43 | comment | added | Oleg Lobachev | Possible duplicate of How to fix a mistake in an accepted paper? | |
| May 14, 2018 at 19:16 | history | edited | KADEM Mohammed | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 121 characters in body; edited title
|
| May 14, 2018 at 13:19 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 14, 2018 at 19:15 | |||||
| May 14, 2018 at 2:02 | comment | added | Deepak | @Anony-Mousse As a reviewer, I wouldn't be too happy about an author who made amendments to the original manuscript but failed to mention them in the response. The author should definitely mention the changes made, as an addendum to the point-by-point response to the reviewer's criticisms. A lot of the time, the repeat review goes back to the same reviewer who recommended a major revision, it's only proper to mention all changes made, both in response to, and independent of, the reviewers' criticisms. | |
| May 13, 2018 at 15:39 | comment | added | Karl | Nitpick: I'm sure your paper was accepted pending major revisions. It's not accepted yet. | |
| May 12, 2018 at 19:21 | history | protected | Alexandros | ||
| May 12, 2018 at 15:08 | answer | added | Ruben Diaz | timeline score: 11 | |
| May 10, 2018 at 14:10 | vote | accept | KADEM Mohammed | ||
| May 10, 2018 at 12:18 | comment | added | Has QUIT--Anony-Mousse | It is a major revision. It will be reviewed again, supposedly. Fix it, consider mentioning the fix somewhere, but you don't even have to. The reviewers should review the major revision in its entirety, not just the changes. | |
| May 9, 2018 at 16:44 | answer | added | Misha R | timeline score: 20 | |
| May 9, 2018 at 14:06 | comment | added | Džuris | Just change it and add a note that you noticed and fixed a mistake in diagram 133.21. | |
| May 9, 2018 at 13:29 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/994207640686383104 | ||
| May 9, 2018 at 12:44 | answer | added | Vikash | timeline score: -4 | |
| May 9, 2018 at 12:33 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 9, 2018 at 17:26 | |||||
| May 9, 2018 at 12:33 | comment | added | theenigma017 | Try asking your prof. | |
| May 9, 2018 at 12:32 | answer | added | David Richerby | timeline score: 128 | |
| May 9, 2018 at 12:31 | answer | added | GEdgar | timeline score: 192 | |
| May 9, 2018 at 12:28 | comment | added | KADEM Mohammed | @theenigma017 it was an anonymous review ! so the only way i can get in touch with them is by writing it in the point-by-point response. | |
| May 9, 2018 at 12:22 | comment | added | theenigma017 | You could email them asking if that block diagram is okay . | |
| May 9, 2018 at 12:19 | history | edited | user68958 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 143 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| May 9, 2018 at 12:18 | answer | added | Fábio Dias | timeline score: 31 | |
| May 9, 2018 at 12:16 | history | edited | KADEM Mohammed | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| May 9, 2018 at 12:16 | comment | added | user68958 | Possible duplicate of Adding a citation after paper is accepted; and a related thread. | |
| May 9, 2018 at 12:13 | history | asked | KADEM Mohammed | CC BY-SA 4.0 |