Timeline for Why are academics not paid royalties on published research papers in IEEE, ACM etc.?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2018 at 18:06 | comment | added | Nemo | @FedericoPoloni I don't have statistics about the usage of the specific addendum, but I know from some authors directly that they achieved changes in the text of contracts proposed to them. | |
| May 2, 2018 at 17:58 | comment | added | Federico Poloni | Is the SPARC addendum still in use? I hadn't heard about it since a few years ago before your post. Moreover, it seems to me that many journals shifted to the "click on this checkbox" format for obtaining consent, and it's difficult to add an addendum to that. (Or maybe yes --- if I change HTML page source using Firefox developer tools before accepting. Hmm, I wonder what's the legal status of that...) | |
| May 2, 2018 at 16:44 | comment | added | henning no longer feeds AI | SPARC is useful information! | |
| May 2, 2018 at 13:40 | history | edited | Nemo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
additional link
|
| May 2, 2018 at 13:03 | history | answered | Nemo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |