Timeline for Have textbook writers really read all the literature in their bibliography?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2018 at 22:23 | answer | added | Dan Romik | timeline score: 10 | |
| Apr 25, 2018 at 17:54 | comment | added | TheMathemagician | Yes of course. <Must keep a straight face.> | |
| Apr 25, 2018 at 11:00 | comment | added | SSimon | I would say NO, bcs I know that most of us only read results, and that is only few sentaces, so it is not much | |
| Apr 25, 2018 at 10:46 | answer | added | MHL | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 25, 2018 at 10:17 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/989085871541497856 | ||
| Apr 25, 2018 at 7:40 | answer | added | xLeitix | timeline score: 15 | |
| Apr 25, 2018 at 3:09 | comment | added | JRN | What do you mean by "read a book"? If I use a definition in a dictionary, then cite the dictionary, am I said to have "read the book"? | |
| Apr 24, 2018 at 16:03 | comment | added | Anyon | Why do you limit the period they can read the literature to when they're writing the book? They might have read Rudin's book as far back as 1953, started writing their own book 40 years later, and finished it in say 1998. That's a lot of time to read stuff. | |
| Apr 24, 2018 at 15:52 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 24, 2018 at 16:57 | |||||
| Apr 24, 2018 at 15:50 | history | asked | Apar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |