Timeline for Waiting after a review
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:49 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://academia.stackexchange.com/ with https://academia.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 28, 2013 at 9:23 | answer | added | F'x | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 28, 2013 at 9:21 | history | edited | F'x | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 14 characters in body
|
| Jun 4, 2013 at 18:19 | comment | added | Irwin | Related. academia.stackexchange.com/questions/900/… | |
| Jun 4, 2013 at 15:07 | answer | added | Yuichiro Fujiwara | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 4, 2013 at 14:39 | comment | added | asociación nogueruelas | "Or maybe you're asked to revise the manuscript extensively" That is! | |
| Jun 4, 2013 at 14:35 | comment | added | Yuichiro Fujiwara | Seems a bit too broad because it can mean a lot of things. It would help if you could be a little more specific. For example, you may specify which field the topic of your paper belongs to (e.g., it can be math, comp sci etc.) and how the first round review went (e.g., it may be conditionally accepted. Or maybe you're asked to revise the manuscript extensively.) Did you receive the decision letter after the first round and resubmit it? Or is it just the status has changed to "with editor" from "under review" or the like? | |
| Jun 4, 2013 at 14:32 | answer | added | Nate Eldredge | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 4, 2013 at 14:23 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 4, 2013 at 14:45 | |||||
| S Jun 4, 2013 at 14:11 | history | suggested | superuser0 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added context and tag and formatting
|
| Jun 4, 2013 at 14:10 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 4, 2013 at 14:11 | |||||
| Jun 4, 2013 at 14:08 | history | asked | asociación nogueruelas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |