Timeline for How to denote the contribution of a co-author who did not do any experiments or analyses?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2018 at 20:53 | answer | added | Wrzlprmft♦ | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 7, 2018 at 20:42 | history | edited | Wrzlprmft♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 9 characters in body; edited title
|
| Feb 7, 2018 at 19:05 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 7, 2018 at 20:42 | |||||
| Feb 6, 2018 at 23:07 | comment | added | Oleg Lobachev | "Investigation, discussions, writing", if you want to be succinct. | |
| Feb 6, 2018 at 22:43 | comment | added | Stella Biderman | You should write exactly that. Author contribution sections are precisely for you to describe how people contributed. Why does that not satisfy you | |
| Feb 6, 2018 at 21:36 | comment | added | Mark | Sounds like he contributed to planning of the project, interpreting the data (I guess - by giving feedback and contributing in discussions) and writing the paper. What is the problem? What is special about this case? | |
| Feb 6, 2018 at 21:25 | history | asked | Lucas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |