Timeline for Expounding implementation details of a paper and provide a full computational analysis
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 13, 2018 at 10:06 | answer | added | Jurgen Strydom | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 22, 2018 at 20:27 | comment | added | prmottajr | You could try to reach the authors, since they have published their research it is not wrong or anti-ethical to implement the a solution. I don't see it as a matter of having to ask for authorization to publish, it is only a possibility for collaboration with them. | |
Mar 22, 2018 at 20:11 | comment | added | user8469759 | It is of my interest, is there any way I can get confirmation? | |
Mar 22, 2018 at 19:52 | comment | added | prmottajr | I think that you could publish that (if it is of your interest of course) as An implementation for the solution presented in "Original Paper". Or you can always upload it to GitHub as well. But it is not possible to say that your implementation is exactly the same if they don't expose their code. | |
Mar 22, 2018 at 19:07 | comment | added | user8469759 | At the end, as usual, they provide experimental results. But my point is more "if they'd done a more careful analysis that could have possibly be useful". Like "theoretically with this implementation you can actually achieve more even theoretically". | |
Mar 22, 2018 at 18:38 | comment | added | user8469759 | Not really, the thing is that paper explains what they used for an implementation. They explained what problem they tried to solve (with a formula). But my point is many technical details are missing. It's essentially one of those problems where they give you a mathematical expression of something (which is a minimization problem in my case) and later they say what hardware they used to find the solution, but they don't actually explain how they did set up many things in order to be executed on a computer. It lacks of these bits, that to me made difficult the implementation. | |
Mar 22, 2018 at 18:05 | comment | added | prmottajr | The original paper cite any patent or restriction? | |
Jan 12, 2018 at 22:08 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/951938996736847874 | ||
Jan 8, 2018 at 12:22 | history | edited | user8469759 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 73 characters in body
|
Jan 8, 2018 at 7:34 | history | asked | user8469759 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |