Timeline for At what point is it OK to claim that you review for a journal in a job application?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2017 at 15:45 | comment | added | StrongBad | @Dijon something like that. I think people list reviews on their CVs to demonstrate that they are respected and contribute to the administrative aspects of the field. For a PhD application, the administrative stuff is not nearly as important as the respect. Turning down the review, has a negative connotation, and is something like a positive (asked to review) offset against a negative (turned it down). Your current position is positive (asked to review) and irrelevant (deadline hasn't happened yet). | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 15:39 | comment | added | Dijon | Thank you for the answer. I am not sure I understand the first paragraph, though: being invited is something worth including in the CV (and relevant to the application), more so than writing the review? Would it still be advisable to add to the CV if, for instance, I were invited but declined to write the review? | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 15:01 | history | answered | StrongBad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |