Timeline for How to handle plagiarism on method that does not affect outcome results when reviewing a paper?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2017 at 14:40 | comment | added | wizzwizz4 | @SSimon Erm... I don't think there are any papers discussing this, but I found this mSE answer. If that helps. | |
| Dec 9, 2017 at 14:34 | comment | added | SSimon | @wizzwizz4 post paper on that | |
| Dec 9, 2017 at 12:55 | comment | added | wizzwizz4 | @SSimon Which can only be set up by moderators, and though it can be used as a PM feature isn't really one. In addition, it should only be used for purposes of moderation, not for sharing information that others might want as well (such as a link to a paper). | |
| Dec 9, 2017 at 12:37 | comment | added | SSimon | really> it is called private chat @wizzwizz4 | |
| Dec 9, 2017 at 10:54 | comment | added | wizzwizz4 | @SSimon There's no such thing as a PM on this site. | |
| Dec 8, 2017 at 8:12 | comment | added | SSimon | @leftaroundabout I cannot find that can you send me in pm? | |
| Dec 7, 2017 at 20:28 | comment | added | leftaroundabout | @Novelocrat “Before continuing here, consult [Reed, Tehfu, King, Man et al. 1743] as a general introduction to the subject”... | |
| Dec 7, 2017 at 16:30 | comment | added | Phil Miller | If another paper's description of a concept is good, and doesn't need to be tailored to the publication at hand to support the novel elements it presents, then the source material can be explicitly quoted with a citation. Honestly, I wish large quotations of stock background material were more broadly accepted practice, as it would spare a lot of effort rewriting these descriptions over and over. | |
| Dec 7, 2017 at 16:21 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 7, 2017 at 16:42 | |||||
| Dec 7, 2017 at 16:20 | history | answered | user84139 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |