@Arno "negliable"?

I didn't got the "Serious Trust Issue" for economics, accounting, etc.? I how it's humor, I just didn't get the punk

The link in the question now points to a website that sells sex toys in India

@jnanin thanks, I think I'll cite that one, although I think it's less updated than the CRAN one

In any way, thanks for the answer :)

..... In a resubmission, what do I change to get the funding I didn't get the first time? The timeline of the project? The amount awarded? The research methodology? I promise to put in more effort than what I promised the first time? That such of thing?

bryan, since you seem knowledgeable about this, can you edit your answer to clarify these points? (1) As I understand it, for example R01 grants can be either investigator-initiated (The NIH was doing nothing and I bother the NIH to get funding) or solicited via a Request for Applications (the NIH issue a RFA, with a timeline, and I apply to it). Is the "resubmission" thing valid for both cases? In case of a RFA, do I have to resubmit inside the timeline given in the RFA? (2) What is the point of a resubmission if I don't get the grant? What do I change? .....

sad that the wildcard doesn't work