New answers tagged

1

Only the last option applies. Once you assign all rights to the IEEE (or anyone), then you no longer have the right to license the work yourself. And the IEEE statements is pretty clear that they retain almost all rights. It doesn't mean that they might not give a more permissive license at some point, but you no longer have that ability.


5

In this case it seems like the only change between the 1995 arXiv version and the 2004 one is that some missing figures were added. You can see this in the arXiv comments field (Also note that v2 is still dated 1995). Therefore you should go ahead and cite the published version. If in the future you find a published paper with unpublished addenda then you ...


7

I think best practice is to include the arxiv identifier for any paper you cite anyway, so the bibliography will include both the publication info and a link to the arxiv. In that sense you don't have to choose just one. If it's say in the introduction and you're writing "The stabilization hypothesis was introduced in [BD]" there's no need to specify which ...


2

Is there is a real possibility that it will be rejected because of its length? No: Length is irrelevant, quality counts. A two page paper could be better than a twenty-two page paper.


Top 50 recent answers are included