Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 8955

On the evaluation of work (typically, a publication or grant proposal) by the author's peers. This includes: refereeing, which is often used to determine an academic paper's suitability for publication in a journal or conference; peer evaluation of teaching skills; peer review of research grant proposals; and post-publication review of a book or article, as is common in the field of mathematics.

41 votes
Accepted

Is It a Common Practice to Contact the Reviewers?

My strong advice is a clear NO! There are several reasons: The journal might contact other reviewers, not the ones you suggested. Possible conflict of interest, even if you don't send your paper w …
visoft's user avatar
  • 656
4 votes

Acknowledging the discussion with someone in the paper but excluding this person as a review...

learning, welcome to Academia StackExchange. In my opinion you should add the name of your colleague to the acknowledgment section of your paper because he gave constructive hints: "The authors w …
visoft's user avatar
  • 656