Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 11257

Questions related to academic publications including online and traditional journals, books, and conference proceedings.

2 votes

Paper accepted in journal, should I remove style file for arXiv preprint?

I think what matters in most cases is whether the journal staff (i.e., not just the external peer reviewers) made some corrections and improvements to the paper. If they did, you generally can't post …
Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen's user avatar
0 votes

How to find a scientific review of a theme?

You may look into meta-analysis: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta-analysis
Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen's user avatar
3 votes

Should I avoid local journals?

A couple of reasons publishing in an X-land journal (like Math.Scand.) could make sense: You'd like to commemorate and emphasize the fact that you were a postdoc in country X; You're interested in g …
Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen's user avatar
17 votes

Add unpublished but widely cited paper to CV?

One strategy is to do a deep-dive to check up on the quality of those 19 citations. If you end up impressed: submit your paper to a journal. (The peer review will add some quality or quality control …
Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen's user avatar
15 votes
Accepted

How often should my papers be rejected?

You could use the principle of maximum entropy. Thus, the first submission should be accepted about 50% of the time. When the first is rejected, next the second submission should be accepted about 50 …
Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen's user avatar
0 votes

Splitting a relatively long paper into two shorter papers

(b) could be a serious problem, because the referee reading the first paper does not know how legitimate the promised application in the second paper is. If so, one option is to just follow the edito …
Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen's user avatar
2 votes

Is it plagiarism for my thesis advisor to publish a paper using content from my thesis witho...

There are many possible explanations. It might be that they considered the algorithm to be easy to find and that they just didn't think of citing you. On the other hand, if they were quite surprised …
Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen's user avatar