Search Results

They have concluded that the paper is clearly not suitable for publication in this journal / conference, and so they are rejecting it without a full review. … Some possible reasons: The work is on a topic not covered by the conference The importance or interest of the result is much less than what the conference normally expects The work has major obvious …

The criteria for approval are usually not selective and mostly just involve a check that your topic is appropriate for the session / conference. … If I am not the only author of the paper, but I am the only speaker at the conference, should I list only myself as the author of the abstract? …

Or they may be planning to ask you before the actual conference, but they put some names in the program tentatively, and it was published before they had a chance to contact you. …

I would expect this to be done by the scientific organizing committee (if there is not a more formal peer review process). It is a scientific task, after all, and requires some level of scientific ju …

"Actually care about it": Read the conference's rules. "Can detect": Irrelevant. Like many things in academic research, this is primarily honor system. If your teammate thinks that whether somethin …

It's perfectly fine to use the question period to alert the speaker to other related work. As with any question, try to keep it brief: one or two sentences. I agree that a "couple minutes" is too lo …

Hey, I saw your abstract for conference XXX. It looks like a very nice venue to discuss our work. … One thing: it looks from the other abstracts like this conference follows the usual convention of mentioning coauthors in the abstract ("this is joint work with...") and it looks like this is missing from …

One thing to note is that unscheduled time during conferences (meal times, evenings, weekends, days off, etc) is commonly used by participants for networking, social events, informal scientific discus …

Remember that for any journal or conference, it is ultimately the editors (or organizers, program committee, etc) who decide whether to accept a paper. …

I think you are misunderstanding the instructions. Let's say a presenter is scheduled to begin their talk at 11:00. If they are not there at 11:00, they have failed to attend, for the purposes of th …

Eventually you get a general sense of how "good" a paper should be in order to be published in this conference, and you compare it with your evaluation of your own paper's quality. …

It's common to have an "Awards" section on an academic CV; you could put it there. Give the exact name of the award, identify the group that awarded it, briefly explain what the award was for, and li …

academics don't pay for professional travel, including conferences, out of their own pockets; often funds are available from your institution, or from any grants that may be funding your project, or from the conference … It's entirely reasonable to ask your advisor about funding sources that might be able to pay the cost for you attending this conference; you should also research possible funding sources yourself. …

get a badge to attend the conference. … wants to be able to meet you inside the conference venue during breaks, meals, etc. …

You probably have sections for "Education" and "Work experience" and maybe "Publications"; make a similar section entitled "Conferences attended" or "Conference participation" or something like that. … Include the title, date and location of each conference, and maybe a short sentence discussing the scope of the meeting and your role. …