Questions tagged [peer-review]

On the evaluation of work (typically, a publication or grant proposal) by the author's peers. This includes: refereeing, which is often used to determine an academic paper's suitability for publication in a journal or conference; peer evaluation of teaching skills; peer review of research grant proposals; and post-publication review of a book or article, as is common in the field of mathematics.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
35 votes
2 answers
34k views

What are the different roles between a program committee member and reviewer?

Does someone know what are the different roles between a Program Committee (PC) member and Reviewer for conferences (e.g., in the field of machine learning)?
mintaka's user avatar
  • 555
26 votes
4 answers
910 views

Measure of review bias

I was reading the other day this blog post, about "how to peer review", and one passage struck me: Don't review like a grad student Reviews written by graduate students are among the most ...
user avatar
18 votes
3 answers
2k views

How to write good Response Letters for the reviewers

I've spoken with many friends, and they all agree that response letters to reviewers should be written in the most kind, cordial and humble possible way. Even if the reviewers are in an error, one ...
Leon palafox's user avatar
20 votes
5 answers
4k views

Can I present the results of a paper that is currently under review?

Among the presentations in a major conference, I attended one where the author cited a paper (of theirs) under review in another major conference. Not only cited it, but showed some of its results. I ...
ElCid's user avatar
  • 3,865
9 votes
1 answer
1k views

How do I respond to a review of the wrong version of my paper?

I have just had the revised version of a paper rejected from a well respected journal. However, one of the reviews is clearly a review of the original draft of the paper, rather than the revised ...
Dikran Marsupial's user avatar
15 votes
2 answers
336 views

Referee access to a not-yet-public URL cited in a paper?

I am reviewing a publication, in which the authors give the URL of an online tool (data analysis and sharing) they have developed. This URL has apparently not yet been publicized, as searching for it ...
F'x's user avatar
  • 73.2k
2 votes
1 answer
1k views

Can you mention that you were a paper reviewer after it has been published? [duplicate]

Possible Duplicate: Are the referees of a journal allowed to reveal the title of the papers they review after the review process? Suppose you were a single-blind paper reviewer (i.e. you could ...
Artem Kaznatcheev's user avatar
7 votes
3 answers
808 views

Are abstracts confidential during the review process?

In an answer to a question about the confidentiality of reviews, I basically said you cannot reveal information about the review until the paper is publicly available. This question about revealing ...
StrongBad's user avatar
  • 104k
24 votes
2 answers
1k views

Are the referees of a journal allowed to reveal the title of the papers they review after the review process?

I am wondering if a referee can reveal the title of the papers he/she has refereed for a journal (either by talking about it in the pub, posting it on facebook or another mean) after the decision has ...
Kalel's user avatar
  • 243
82 votes
6 answers
67k views

Do you list journals you have reviewed for on your CV?

Is it acceptable to list the journals you have reviewed papers for on your CV? Is it common? Do you think it’s recommended? On the one hand, it shows that you are engaged in this necessary part of ...
F'x's user avatar
  • 73.2k
65 votes
5 answers
174k views

What does a "major revision" mean?

I recently received the reviews/comments for an article submitted few months back to a journal. All the reviewers overall appreciated the content and the usefulness, but also suggested corrections (...
user avatar
20 votes
1 answer
6k views

How to review a paper for originality?

Originality with timeliness is among the most important criteria for a paper to get published. Many a times when we are reviewing a paper, we are faced with dilemma as to how much of it is original, ...
Stat-R's user avatar
  • 2,635
8 votes
1 answer
501 views

How to revise/resubmit a rejected article taking an unorthodox view

This question is similar to Overcoming Fear of Rejection, but not the same. My experience in academia was teaching Computer Science for four years at a mostly liberal arts college, and that was 30 ...
Mike Dunlavey's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
420 views

Can grant money be spent on travel to program committee meetings?

Many research conferences hold an in-person program committee meeting for all of the members of the program committee, where the PC members make the final decisions about which papers to accept or ...
D.W.'s user avatar
  • 8,271
153 votes
5 answers
18k views

What to do if a referee plagiarises the result after rejecting a paper?

I find myself in an awkward situation. Nearly two years ago I submitted a paper to a reputable mathematics journal. After 15 months it was rejected with the rationale that there had been papers ...
jp26's user avatar
  • 1,633
20 votes
2 answers
2k views

How to ensure proper peer-review for a self-published book?

In this day and age, with more and more people going the self-publishing route, I'd be interested in experiences from/opinions about how to go about having your self-published book properly peer-...
Marc van Dongen's user avatar
29 votes
2 answers
7k views

Under what circumstances can one republish a conference paper/presentation?

For conferences that "peer review" and "publish" full papers, when, if ever, can you resubmit essentially unchanged versions for publication in a peer reviewed journal? In my field, when conference ...
StrongBad's user avatar
  • 104k
14 votes
2 answers
3k views

How to find response time for a given journal in engineering?

I would like to find journals response times? A google search does not give any good results. May be I am using wrong key words. I am open to find particular subset of journal response times too. ...
Atilla Ozgur's user avatar
  • 2,164
16 votes
4 answers
625 views

Pros and cons on commenting on public review papers

Journals such as AMTD and ACPD contain an open discussion where anybody can comment on papers under review. The peer-reviewers are still anonymous, but other people commenting are not. If I'm reading ...
gerrit's user avatar
  • 42.8k
39 votes
3 answers
7k views

Should I worry about a referee who recommended rejection being offended if my paper is accepted?

After submitting a paper for review, I received a letter from the editors containing a negative report and informing me that their (editors') decision was to reject the paper. Although the paper was ...
user1209's user avatar
  • 399
19 votes
2 answers
2k views

Useful software resources for reviewing papers

I have a paper for review and I would like to include comments (on clarifications/suggestions/errors) over specific paragraphs or statements. What are some ideal software resources that could help ...
Bravo's user avatar
  • 23k
15 votes
1 answer
343 views

Conflict declaration in reviews

Consider the following scenario: A is working on a problem X and has unpublished new material. A is then asked to review a paper: upon reading the abstract, A realizes that the authors are ...
Suresh's user avatar
  • 50.7k
8 votes
1 answer
9k views

What are refereed and non-refereed journals?

What does it mean by publication in refereed and non-refereed journals? Are these terms applicable to conference papers too? Is there any relationship with peer-review?
ShadowWarrior's user avatar
25 votes
3 answers
2k views

Can I show my co-author the final version of an accepted publication I reviewed?

I was reviewing a journal paper recently that is closely related to work a colleague and I are doing. We are currently in the process of writing up our paper, and I plan to cite the paper I reviewed ...
Artem Kaznatcheev's user avatar
8 votes
3 answers
554 views

How can I get involved in grant proposal reviews as a graduate student?

I need to get some more experience with writing grant proposals, and I know that professors are often invited to review them. How can I get involved in it while still being just a graduate student?
Paul's user avatar
  • 11.4k
22 votes
3 answers
11k views

Should we reply to the editor after a paper has been rejected and we don't plan to revise/resubmit?

After receiving a rejection (not revise and resubmit) decision from the editor/associate editor of a journal, should we write an email to thank him/her for the time, or just do nothing? I imagine one ...
CC cat's user avatar
  • 797
5 votes
1 answer
7k views

How do I become a journal reviewer? [duplicate]

Possible Duplicate: How do you earn opportunites to review journals or conference papers? Assume that I have just finished my postdoc and am now starting a professorship/scientist position (I am ...
bobthejoe's user avatar
  • 4,745
17 votes
3 answers
1k views

Are reviewers allowed to discuss their review with each other?

Suppose you find out that someone you know well or work with is reviewing the same journal paper you are reviewing (i.e., finding out this information on your own, and not via the journal or editor, ...
Ran G.'s user avatar
  • 7,464
55 votes
4 answers
4k views

Attributing contributions to academic work that occur in Stack Exchange

Sometimes we may ask questions on stack exchange or online forums wherein the response is helpful or even essential to a piece of work that gets published in an academic journal. If this occurs, how ...
Cameron Smith's user avatar
9 votes
3 answers
2k views

How should I interpret a journal rejection of "not of sufficient interest" or "does not meet journal standards" without mention of any errors?

How should I interpret a journal rejection of "not of sufficient interest" or "does not meet journal standards"? This is what happened to me particularly. Papers were rejected for those reasons and ...
Juan's user avatar
  • 99
42 votes
4 answers
12k views

How do you earn opportunites to review journals or conference papers?

Critical reading is a very useful skill for most PhD students (and postdocs and researchers in general). Instead of assuming that everything you read in a scientific paper is right, it's useful to ...
DavideChicco.it's user avatar
8 votes
2 answers
659 views

Additional data for anonymous submission

I've recently submitted a paper to a conference requiring anonymous submission, meaning that the name of the authors should not be included, and no obvious self-reference should be made. The problem ...
user avatar
22 votes
2 answers
3k views

How to tell what is 'widely accepted' or 'consensus'

How can I find out what theories are 'widely accepted' in the scientific world at the moment? When I read about a theory, or read a paper, how can I tell what 'the scientific world' thinks of these? ...
Armatus's user avatar
  • 917
31 votes
3 answers
25k views

How to write a rebuttal for a conference

What are good practices (does and don'ts) when writing a rebuttal for a conference? For example, for a journal rebuttal letter you can make changes to your paper, and resubmit it for another revision....
adn's user avatar
  • 661
24 votes
2 answers
482 views

How to act as an editor?

I have been on both the author and the referee sides, but I was wondering how editors approach their task. In particular, to what level of detail do you read the paper you assign to referees, and when ...
Anthony Labarre's user avatar
52 votes
6 answers
113k views

When / how should I ask about a manuscript's status in review?

I have a manuscript that has been in review for 60 days. The journal asks for reviews within four weeks. At what point is it acceptable (and not detrimental) to contact the editor for an update? How ...
Abe's user avatar
  • 3,285
32 votes
4 answers
40k views

When is it appropriate to decline a review request?

There are some clear reasons to decline a review request, such as conflict-of-interests or not enough free time (e.g., going on a vacation..). But what if you are just not interested in the paper you ...
Ran G.'s user avatar
  • 7,464
47 votes
8 answers
4k views

Can I publish the reviews I write?

This is a follow-up question to Open versus Blind reviewing process, and is somehow related to What happens to the reviews that people write for journal articles after they're sent back to the ...
user avatar
37 votes
6 answers
1k views

Open versus Blind reviewing process

A question I have been wondering for a while is if there exists an actual proof that a blind reviewing process (i.e. where the reviewers are anonymous, and the reviews not published) is better than an ...
user avatar
25 votes
3 answers
4k views

How do you join programme committees for conferences?

For most conferences in my field it seems to be invitation-only, i.e. somebody has to suggest you/remember you. Are there any conferences that have open calls for applications to the programme ...
Lars Kotthoff's user avatar
15 votes
6 answers
946 views

What happens to the reviews that people write for journal articles after they're sent back to the author?

Are they almost always kept confidential? Or is there protocol for sharing them?
InquilineKea's user avatar
  • 10.8k
38 votes
9 answers
2k views

Scope for the role of peer reviewer

As a young scholar I frequently struggle with knowing the extent to which I should be critical of particular components of papers I am reviewing. I can formulate a rough hierarchy between major ...
Andy W's user avatar
  • 3,561

1
44 45 46 47
48