Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 175 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Visit Stack Exchange

Questions tagged [peer-review]

On the evaluation of work (typically, a publication or grant proposal) by the author's peers. This includes: refereeing, which is often used to determine an academic paper's suitability for publication in a journal or conference; peer evaluation of teaching skills; peer review of research grant proposals; and post-publication review of a book or article, as is common in the field of mathematics.

2
votes
2answers
110 views

What is scholarship score in paper review?

I got paper reviews and I found there is an item scholarship, Can anyone tell what is scholarship score mean in paper review?
3
votes
1answer
245 views

Make changes to (my own) already published IEEE paper?

The initial copy of IEEE paper that I had submitted required some changes which the conference convenor requested after reviewing. So I made the changes and submitted again but the convenor ...
2
votes
1answer
316 views

Registering systematic review in Prospero

I have recently submitted a systematic review (SR) to a journal. One of the reviewers pointed out, that my SR was not registered in Prospero, an international prospective register of systematic ...
0
votes
1answer
117 views

Typo errors in a submitted paper

I have submitted a paper 3 weeks ago for a good journal + conference and I just figured out that there are small typo mistakes. It is very disappointing as I have made a great effort (who does not) to ...
0
votes
1answer
58 views

Editor decision OJS system

After 3 days of sending my paper to the reviewers by the editor i have a new status saying that "New reviews have been submitted and are being considered by the editor". and 1/4 Assigned reviews ...
3
votes
0answers
127 views

To what extent are reviewers influenced by other reviews?

Is there any research/study/survey/... that looked at to what extent reviewers are influenced by other reviews? For example, ICLR 2019 published reviews publicly before all reviewers had written the ...
2
votes
0answers
110 views

Citation depth dilemma (writing sci. article for peer review journal)

The scenario: in an article, found a point/claim/fact that would fit/support perfectly a broader point I'm trying to construct (@Related works section) The dilemma: Whom to cite? a) only the ...
2
votes
0answers
492 views

Should I list my work as a frequent journal reviewer as a volunteer work in LinkedIn?

I am a frequent reviewer for a particular (computer science) journal, and I wonder if the review work I do counts as a "volunteer" work? I do already list this work in my CV under (PROFESSIONAL ...
2
votes
0answers
79 views

Choosing a journal to offer services for review

I'm a Master's level statistician working in academics research, public health policy, and so on. The area itself is marginally interesting to me. I'm interested in professional development, but my ...
2
votes
0answers
151 views

Does suggesting potential reviewers for one's submitted paper increase the likelihood of the paper being accepted?

Some journals propose authors to suggest potential reviewers for their submitted papers. Is there any research/study/survey that tried to quantify to what extent suggesting potential reviewers for ...
2
votes
0answers
207 views

Contacting editor-in-chief regarding delay ?

I have a paper in review in a prestigious applied math journal. The average time from first submission to final decision in that journal is about 8 months. The first round of reviews took 7 months. ...
2
votes
0answers
110 views

How can reviewers validate work that does not include source code or raw experiment data?

FYI, I am in CS and EE field. Relevant journals and conferences are organized by IEEE, ACM, USENIX and so on. I've noticed that many paper submission system don't require neither source code nor ...
1
vote
0answers
37 views

Are contributions to the American Political Science Review labeled “Letter” peer reviewed?

I suspect that in general, they are not, but perhaps someone who knows better could clarify. However, I am looking specifically at the American Political Science Review, where contributions labeled "...
1
vote
0answers
78 views

Delayed conference review notifications

We recently submitted a paper to a large IEEE conference (ISIT 2019). We have not yet heard back from our reviewers and the dates for the same have passed (it has been a week since). Is this anomalous ...
1
vote
0answers
80 views

Counting journal reviews (when reviewing revisions)

We've discussed how many papers we should review, but how do we count reviews? Sometimes I review 2-3 versions of a manuscript before it is finally accepted/rejected. Should I count each version that ...
1
vote
0answers
844 views

Reject after major revision, reason is that the journal is not suitable for this kind of work

I submitted a paper in a renowned journal. The first decision was a major revision (revise and resubmit) asking questions. I answered them all and the reviewers were happy with the answers. The second ...
1
vote
0answers
131 views

public opinion about published articles

As a young scientist I find it increasingly difficult to filter out the good vs not-so-good research publications. Especially given the number of publications that get published every day. Reports on ...
1
vote
0answers
2k views

Editor invited after minor revision submitted

According to editor guideline on springer website "Accept with minor revisions is actually a commitment to ultimately publish the paper, provided the authors answer the remaining concerns (which ...
1
vote
0answers
94 views

What are turnaround times like in Finance, Financial Economics, Economics / Econometrics journals?

What are turnaround times like in Finance, Financial Economics, Economics / Econometrics journals? I would be among at least a 1000 other aspirants looking to publish in quality journals. There ...
1
vote
0answers
101 views

Is it OK to invite PhD scientists (Bio and Pharma) to peer review manuscripts?

I recently joined the editorial board of a decent OA journal. I got requests to handle quite some manuscripts very soon. I accepted to handle the first 2 and soon I saw another two and then another ...
0
votes
0answers
22 views

Slow peer-review process for a Major Revision

I have submitted a paper to a journal in which the reviewers have suggested some major revisions. I have submitted the revised manuscript on 27-May-2019. After the two days the status changed to ...
0
votes
0answers
164 views

How to prepare a good response to referee reports when I have a weak reject and two accepts?

I received a weak reject, an accept and a strong accept from a top-tier conference in CS. So, I need to prepare a careful rebuttal response! The problem is that the weak-reject reviewer did not ask ...
0
votes
0answers
22 views

How to cite a published review report of a journal article?

I found an interesting idea that was discussed in detail in a published reviewer report on an article in journal X (an open peer review journal) and I want to mention it in my manuscript. How to ...
0
votes
0answers
109 views

Changing the method after first peer review round

I have submitted a paper and got a R&R. After the submission, I have learned new method techniques for my research and I found those very compelling. Now, I would like to use them and I was ...